Yesterday I called the San Francisco Coroner’s Office for the second time to learn if the autopsy results pertaining to the alleged suicide of Ilya Zhitimirskiy’s had finally been determined. It has been almost two months since his tragic death, allegedly by suicide according to the media, on November 12, 2011. The San Francisco Coroner’s office announced on that day that the autopsy and toxicology reports would “take about three weeks” (that is, December 5, 2011) before the autopsy results would be completed. The promised announcement date has come and gone and it has now been almost two months without an autopsy report concerning his cause of death. I think Ilya may have been murdered: First of all, Ilya left no suicide note and next, he had no known motive to kill himself. Now, on top of that, no autopsy results have yet been released. Shouldn’t one be even slightly suspicious? .
I first enquired the Coroner’s office on January 23, 2012, to learn about Ilya’s autopsy results. The examiner said that no results had been announced. I called the Coroner’s office again yesterday, February 6, 2012, almost two months after his death. I was jolted when the medical examiner on duty told me that Ilya’s autopsy results would not be forthcoming “for another three months or so”. Something odd seems to be occurring within the Coroner’s office. Have they been told to retard the final results of Ilya’s autopsy? Is there an information black-out about his death?
As I said, I have the feeling that Ilya was murdered and that his death may not have been a “suicide”. I wonder, too, why Ilya’s autopsy results have not been released by now. Are there guilty parties behind the scenes who hope the public forgets his very sad demise?
Sincerely, George W Hunt firstname.lastname@example.org
Have you ever wondered why important people, seemingly in good spirits, commit suicide while their close friends often swear the victim has shown no previous indications to be led to such a monstrous act. I wondered a lot when James Amschel Rothschild “killed himself” in his hotel room near the Champs Elysee in Paris in June 1996. He was the apparent heir to head the Rothschild Dynasty until he hung himself one night and left no note. He had not exhibited depression or other signs of distress according to close sources. The Inspector General of Paris examined the site of the crime, pulled out the bathroom towel rack from which Baron RothschIld had supposedly hung himself, and announced “The towel rack could not have supported his body. He was murdered.”. Rupert Murdock’s news bureau hushed the story about Mr. Rothschild’s murder. If the story did leak out, which of course it did here and there, the media response was “Mr. Rothschild suffered a heart attack”.
I also wonder why the youngest son of the former Shah of Iran, Alireza Pahlevi (44), “killed himself” in his Boston apartment in January 2011. It is said that he had hopes of returning to Iran to help establish democracy according to his close friends and associates. His death received only mild mention in the U.S. media and, if it did mention the tragedy, the stories explained that he had “great anger and sorrow about his father’s demise in 1979. Occasional hearsay says that the betrayers of his father were the CIA and Henry Kissinger.
I was stunned to hear that Ilya Zhitomirskiy (22), founder of Diaspora, a Facebook alternative private social site, had committed suicide. Why did Ilya kill himself last month (November 2011) when he was becoming such a success in establishing his social site? The investment money was flowing in (though PayPal was not passing the donations on to him for some reason) and he was apparently healthy in mind, body and spirit. I am awaiting the autopsy results to learn of the actual cause of death. Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook CEO, announced after Ilya’s death that he had been one of the 6,500 donors to Ilya’s project, Facebook quickly cleansed itself.
Yours Truly, George W Hunt