Conservation Versus Growth & Development
“People
can’t worry about the air their grandchildren will breathe when they are worried
about the food their child will eat today.”
– William
Ruckleshaus
“In some
businessmen’s minds it’s acceptable to sacrifice the environment of the future
for the profits of today.”
– David Rockefeller
People
the world over worry about economic need outweighing environmental
conservation
By
Reed Glenn
Camera Staff Writer
David Rockefeller Addresses the
Conference – We seem to be experiencing the first cosmic vibrations of the
Harmonic Convergence – if the Fourth World Wilderness Congress held here last
weekend is any indication.
“We are having a great convergence today – not a Harmonic Convergence –
but a global convergence,” said convener Maurice Strong, the Canadian president
of American Water Development Co., Inc.
The congress – which concludes in
Estes Park Friday – marked the unprecedented philosophic convergence of two
traditionally warring factions: environmentalists and developers.
“I’d like to introduce two of
America’s most distinguished leaders, who to some are ‘Mr. Environment’ and ‘Mr.
Development.’ ” said Sunday’s moderator James Speth, president of the World
Resource Institute. “Mr. Environment.” William Ruckleshaus, and “Mr.
Development,” David Rockefeller, addressed the private sector’s role and
responsibilities in financing conservation and sustainable development.
Attorney Ruckleshaus was the first
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency administrator. (Some might debate his
quoted title because of his affiliations with various corporations.) Rockefeller
is a world financial leader, philanthropist and retired Chase Manhattan Bank
chairman.
Both agreed
that protecting the environment is everyone’s business, and that “the survival
of our planet depends on profound changes in the way we do business,”
Ruckleshaus said – noting that “the way we do the wilderness depend upon solving
underlying global problems – poverty being the foremost. “Tomorrow is swallowed
up in the mouth of today. People can’t worry about the air their grandchildren
will breathe when they are worried about the food their child will eat today,”
David Rockefeller addresses the “damages
that can result when we fail to realize a reasonable compromise between economic
and environmental concerns.” Two extreme positions threaten the future, he said
– “those who pollute helter-skelter” and “those who place all environmental
concerns before the well-being of the people on the planet.”
“In some businessmen’s minds it’s
acceptable to sacrifice the environment of the future for the profits of today.
The blind pursuit of profits has enacted its own form of tyranny on the rest of
humankind.” Rockefeller added that it was not fair, however, to place all the
blame on business.
“The desperation of the poor places as much stress on the environment as
industrial growth. Seventy percent of the world depends on wood to heat and
cook,” he said. Overgrazing in places like the Sahel region in Africa lead to
desertification, but it’s the only way some farmers can stave off
starvation.